Friday, April 15, 2011
Circumcision is a Baaaaad Idea
(4)
(Looks like I must always specify Verdana as the font.)
Time is short tonight, so let's get on to a more user-friendly subject. Hows about some Pussy! Soft Pink. Did I do that one already? Oh well...
Leading Atheist Publishes Secular Bible. (Calls it, The Good Book. Eheh.)
Should Teens Make Circumcision Decision? This one also from CNN. Written by a Jewish female (I think), it is nothing less than Jewish tribal propaganda in the face of dramatically falling American circumcision rates. Now, don't get me wrong: I've seen her on CNN, and she is a good-looking, competent woman. But if I am right about her 'tribal connections' her piece is riddled with tribal prejudices. Example:
One doctor suggests considering this approach: Stop circumcising newborns altogether and allow boys to make their own circumcision decision when they approach puberty, in the years before they become sexually active, since that's when they'll get the benefits of the procedure.
This sounds superficially reasonable: 'Let the little guy decide at age, say, 10, before he has had his first orgasm from (yuck) masturbation, whether or not he wants the juicy parts cut off.'
Superficial and dumb! I say, let him wait until the traditional age of 'consent,' age 18. By that time he will have become very familiar with his penis from having masturbated to orgasm hundreds of times, maybe thousands of times (in my case it was thousands). He will have learned how to prolong the period before ejaculation significantly, for example. Those years will have been 'training years.' He will have learned Mother Nature's most powerful male 'self-nurturing procedure.' He will have navigated the treacherous waters of sexual maturation. He will have become a real man. (thump) And if, at the age of 18, he agrees to be circumcised for 'cosmetic' or other reasons, then 'god bless 'im.'
Concerning circumcision's ability to prevent sexually transmitted disease, that is mostly nonsense. What circumcision does prevent is... sexual satisfaction.
And finally, the article suggests that cutting off the juicy parts does not affect penile 'sensitivity.' Utter nonsense! Thousands of specialized nerve endings are lost to circumcision. Furthermore, the glans, previously protected by the foreskin, loses its protection and becomes dry and 'keratinized.'
Circumcision is a Baaaaad idea.
(Looks like I must always specify Verdana as the font.)
Time is short tonight, so let's get on to a more user-friendly subject. Hows about some Pussy! Soft Pink. Did I do that one already? Oh well...
Leading Atheist Publishes Secular Bible. (Calls it, The Good Book. Eheh.)
Should Teens Make Circumcision Decision? This one also from CNN. Written by a Jewish female (I think), it is nothing less than Jewish tribal propaganda in the face of dramatically falling American circumcision rates. Now, don't get me wrong: I've seen her on CNN, and she is a good-looking, competent woman. But if I am right about her 'tribal connections' her piece is riddled with tribal prejudices. Example:
One doctor suggests considering this approach: Stop circumcising newborns altogether and allow boys to make their own circumcision decision when they approach puberty, in the years before they become sexually active, since that's when they'll get the benefits of the procedure.
This sounds superficially reasonable: 'Let the little guy decide at age, say, 10, before he has had his first orgasm from (yuck) masturbation, whether or not he wants the juicy parts cut off.'
Superficial and dumb! I say, let him wait until the traditional age of 'consent,' age 18. By that time he will have become very familiar with his penis from having masturbated to orgasm hundreds of times, maybe thousands of times (in my case it was thousands). He will have learned how to prolong the period before ejaculation significantly, for example. Those years will have been 'training years.' He will have learned Mother Nature's most powerful male 'self-nurturing procedure.' He will have navigated the treacherous waters of sexual maturation. He will have become a real man. (thump) And if, at the age of 18, he agrees to be circumcised for 'cosmetic' or other reasons, then 'god bless 'im.'
Concerning circumcision's ability to prevent sexually transmitted disease, that is mostly nonsense. What circumcision does prevent is... sexual satisfaction.
And finally, the article suggests that cutting off the juicy parts does not affect penile 'sensitivity.' Utter nonsense! Thousands of specialized nerve endings are lost to circumcision. Furthermore, the glans, previously protected by the foreskin, loses its protection and becomes dry and 'keratinized.'
Circumcision is a Baaaaad idea.
