Thursday, March 30, 2006
Testing...
(1)
The power of prayer here.
The God Project here.
It finally dawned on me how the 'extra' http//: gets on the links: it is not replaced by the newly pasted link, which is merely appended to it. Dumb.
Test. Yep, I am dumb. I just selected the (other) option, which works just fine.
The power of prayer here.
The God Project here.
It finally dawned on me how the 'extra' http//: gets on the links: it is not replaced by the newly pasted link, which is merely appended to it. Dumb.
Test. Yep, I am dumb. I just selected the (other) option, which works just fine.
Sunday, March 26, 2006
Female Penis Envy?
(2)
The Circumcision Cult continues marching on here. Doctor Judith Reichman, probable Jew, recommends neonatal circumcision on some pretty skinny grounds in this article, which answers the question of an 'expectant mother' wondering whether she should have her son circumcised.
The 'expectant mother' is unnamed and otherwise unidentified.
Reichman begins by saying that 'Ultimately, it's a personal decision but the majority of parents do decide to have it done.' What does this mean? If it is indeed a 'personal decision' then should the child not be consulted? After all, it is his person which is being sexually mutilated.
There followed the usual nonsense about urinary tract infections, penile cancer, penile inflamation, STDs, and decreased risk of cervical cancer in the possible future wife of the little guy. These may be of some minor concern to some parents but probably not to the little guy on the cutting board who is about to have a major part of his future sexual pleasure taken away from him forever by people who swore an oath to 'first, do no harm.'
Reichman does allow that there are some drawbacks to the 'procedure' in the form of pain, bleeding and infection, but utterly fails to point out that Mother Nature designed the penis in its original form for a good reason: it works! The mutilated (Jewish) version also works... after a fashion, but much of the pleasurable sexual sensation is necessarily missing. The article ends with:
'Dr. Reichman’s Bottom Line: Religion and “what daddy looks like down there” greatly influence parents’ decisions about circumcision. But health concerns should also play a role: you have to consider the baby’s current and long-term health, plus the health of his potential future partner. I personally would go for it. Then again, I don’t have a penis.'
Interesting. Could we have here an actual case of female penis envy?
The Circumcision Cult continues marching on here. Doctor Judith Reichman, probable Jew, recommends neonatal circumcision on some pretty skinny grounds in this article, which answers the question of an 'expectant mother' wondering whether she should have her son circumcised.
The 'expectant mother' is unnamed and otherwise unidentified.
Reichman begins by saying that 'Ultimately, it's a personal decision but the majority of parents do decide to have it done.' What does this mean? If it is indeed a 'personal decision' then should the child not be consulted? After all, it is his person which is being sexually mutilated.
There followed the usual nonsense about urinary tract infections, penile cancer, penile inflamation, STDs, and decreased risk of cervical cancer in the possible future wife of the little guy. These may be of some minor concern to some parents but probably not to the little guy on the cutting board who is about to have a major part of his future sexual pleasure taken away from him forever by people who swore an oath to 'first, do no harm.'
Reichman does allow that there are some drawbacks to the 'procedure' in the form of pain, bleeding and infection, but utterly fails to point out that Mother Nature designed the penis in its original form for a good reason: it works! The mutilated (Jewish) version also works... after a fashion, but much of the pleasurable sexual sensation is necessarily missing. The article ends with:
'Dr. Reichman’s Bottom Line: Religion and “what daddy looks like down there” greatly influence parents’ decisions about circumcision. But health concerns should also play a role: you have to consider the baby’s current and long-term health, plus the health of his potential future partner. I personally would go for it. Then again, I don’t have a penis.'
Interesting. Could we have here an actual case of female penis envy?
Cause and Effect
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Two Different Takes
(1)
The efficacy of bibles here. Funny.
How Jews control the government here. There was something of an uproar about this one on 'Scarborough Country' last night.
The efficacy of bibles here. Funny.
How Jews control the government here. There was something of an uproar about this one on 'Scarborough Country' last night.
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
A Fun Site
(1)
This is a fun site. I spent at least an hour here, giggling, as my demented mind proposed various outrageous subjects to explore. I'll probably do at least one 'how to' on this site some day. As usual, 'Clicked' was my source for this.
This is a fun site. I spent at least an hour here, giggling, as my demented mind proposed various outrageous subjects to explore. I'll probably do at least one 'how to' on this site some day. As usual, 'Clicked' was my source for this.
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Recent Events Troublshooting
(1)
Recent events have more or less forced me to learn a little more about the mechanics of Blogger, including troubleshooting the previous failed links in this particular blog. The problem with the failed links turned out to be an extra 'http//' in the link. No Idea how it got there. I've corrected the links.
The date/time problem mentioned in Non Serviam was solved simply by clicking the 'Post and Comment Options' at the bottom of the composing frame. Whether this is a new feature or whether it is an old ignored/overlooked feature remains undetermined.
The problem with the huge number of blank lines in one of the previous posts in Non Serviam remains a mystery.
Recent events have more or less forced me to learn a little more about the mechanics of Blogger, including troubleshooting the previous failed links in this particular blog. The problem with the failed links turned out to be an extra 'http//' in the link. No Idea how it got there. I've corrected the links.
The date/time problem mentioned in Non Serviam was solved simply by clicking the 'Post and Comment Options' at the bottom of the composing frame. Whether this is a new feature or whether it is an old ignored/overlooked feature remains undetermined.
The problem with the huge number of blank lines in one of the previous posts in Non Serviam remains a mystery.
Testing...
