Friday, May 21, 2010
Thank You God!
(2)
The subject of this particular entry will be a critique of (4) below: 'God is Numb.' I made that assertion (boom) because the Jewish God is obviously jealous of the human ability to feel sexual pleasure. God has no penis. God can feel no sexual pleasure. God therefore seeks to mitigate His deficiency vs His human 'subjects' by mandating the desensitizing 'procedure' of 'circumcision.' The sexually desensitized individual feels uncomfortable in the presence of more sexually sensitive people (dogs included). That individual therefore seeks to feel more comfortable by desensitizing The Other. God is no exception. Neither is your daddy. Neither is the Jew who works in the next cubicle. Neither is Yo Mama, as the dumbass bitch Sandra Bullock recently demonstrated. (Some particularly bereft circumcates might wish to circumcise their male dogs too, but I have not stumbled across any examples in modern media. That said, I will do a Google Search: Yeesh!)
The article is interesting, but my attention was drawn to the very last paragraph:
----------
'The Hispanic respondents reported a higher-than-average level of health concerns, but the survey found, "Hispanics are more sexually active and satisfied than the general population."'
----------
My response is that this result is explainable in terms of Hispanic Intactness. Hispanics are more sexually intact than other Americans, and Hispanics therefore enjoy a higher level of sexual satisfaction, including not only the various forms of coitis, but masturbation as well. Insofar as Hispanics expressed 'a higher level of health concerns' I doubt the cause was sexual intactness. More likely, the cause was the relatively lower level of health care, a factor which - paradoxically! - contributed to their intactness in the first place and therefore to their higher level of sexual satisfaction.
Interestingly, when I first read this post, I noted the point that, 'Men over 45 reported a decrease in sexual satisfaction.' But I cannot find it in this particular version. Was it 'revised?' Probably.
For my part I can report reliably that I did not notice any decrease in sexual satisfaction/pleasure before the age of 65. If memory serves in this case, it suggests that circumcision literally takes 20 years off your sexual life. Thank you God!
Thank you Doctor (insert name of Jewish Pediatrician).
The subject of this particular entry will be a critique of (4) below: 'God is Numb.' I made that assertion (boom) because the Jewish God is obviously jealous of the human ability to feel sexual pleasure. God has no penis. God can feel no sexual pleasure. God therefore seeks to mitigate His deficiency vs His human 'subjects' by mandating the desensitizing 'procedure' of 'circumcision.' The sexually desensitized individual feels uncomfortable in the presence of more sexually sensitive people (dogs included). That individual therefore seeks to feel more comfortable by desensitizing The Other. God is no exception. Neither is your daddy. Neither is the Jew who works in the next cubicle. Neither is Yo Mama, as the dumbass bitch Sandra Bullock recently demonstrated. (Some particularly bereft circumcates might wish to circumcise their male dogs too, but I have not stumbled across any examples in modern media. That said, I will do a Google Search: Yeesh!)
The article is interesting, but my attention was drawn to the very last paragraph:
----------
'The Hispanic respondents reported a higher-than-average level of health concerns, but the survey found, "Hispanics are more sexually active and satisfied than the general population."'
----------
My response is that this result is explainable in terms of Hispanic Intactness. Hispanics are more sexually intact than other Americans, and Hispanics therefore enjoy a higher level of sexual satisfaction, including not only the various forms of coitis, but masturbation as well. Insofar as Hispanics expressed 'a higher level of health concerns' I doubt the cause was sexual intactness. More likely, the cause was the relatively lower level of health care, a factor which - paradoxically! - contributed to their intactness in the first place and therefore to their higher level of sexual satisfaction.
Interestingly, when I first read this post, I noted the point that, 'Men over 45 reported a decrease in sexual satisfaction.' But I cannot find it in this particular version. Was it 'revised?' Probably.
For my part I can report reliably that I did not notice any decrease in sexual satisfaction/pleasure before the age of 65. If memory serves in this case, it suggests that circumcision literally takes 20 years off your sexual life. Thank you God!
Thank you Doctor (insert name of Jewish Pediatrician).
