Friday, May 28, 2010
Like Eye Without Eyelid
(2)
In passing I need to comment on The Intactivism Pages' stance of 'abject political correctness' compared with Wikipedia. In fact, it was this link on TIP which 'got me going.' It is so... politically correct! So Jew-friendly! (Beginning beer #7. Time to watch the news.) As I watched the animation I said, That's not how it works.' Reviewing that animation just now I can say that, so far as it goes it is more or less accurate, but stops waaaay too soon. Notice, for example, that the 'excess' penile skin 'piles up' behind the sulcus, and that more penile skin 'piles up' lower on the shaft. I wanted to see exactly how the penile foreskin 'acted' during coitus. What happens, for example, when the penis is thrust deeply into the vagina? The animation doesn't say (depict). The animation more or less accurately describes a penis being 'skinned back.' That much is true. But what the animation fails to graphically show is how the penis presents itself to the vagina as a kindred internal organ, as the penile skin is fully extended by vaginal friction. The sensitive inner foreskin literally replaces excess penile shaft skin, which piles up at the penile base, such that most of the penile covering is sensitive inner foreskin, interacting with slippery inner vagina.
The internal parts of the penis interact perfectly with the internal parts of the vagina when the foreskin is inverted.
Circumcision changes all that. The penis becomes 'externalized.' The result is a dry, externalized sexual organ, insensitive and difficult to masturbate. Furthermore, the 'externalized' glans may actually become 'too sensitive' because it lacks normal protection from clothing, a service provided by the foreskin. Circumsision fucks up everything.
In passing I need to comment on The Intactivism Pages' stance of 'abject political correctness' compared with Wikipedia. In fact, it was this link on TIP which 'got me going.' It is so... politically correct! So Jew-friendly! (Beginning beer #7. Time to watch the news.) As I watched the animation I said, That's not how it works.' Reviewing that animation just now I can say that, so far as it goes it is more or less accurate, but stops waaaay too soon. Notice, for example, that the 'excess' penile skin 'piles up' behind the sulcus, and that more penile skin 'piles up' lower on the shaft. I wanted to see exactly how the penile foreskin 'acted' during coitus. What happens, for example, when the penis is thrust deeply into the vagina? The animation doesn't say (depict). The animation more or less accurately describes a penis being 'skinned back.' That much is true. But what the animation fails to graphically show is how the penis presents itself to the vagina as a kindred internal organ, as the penile skin is fully extended by vaginal friction. The sensitive inner foreskin literally replaces excess penile shaft skin, which piles up at the penile base, such that most of the penile covering is sensitive inner foreskin, interacting with slippery inner vagina.
The internal parts of the penis interact perfectly with the internal parts of the vagina when the foreskin is inverted.
Circumcision changes all that. The penis becomes 'externalized.' The result is a dry, externalized sexual organ, insensitive and difficult to masturbate. Furthermore, the 'externalized' glans may actually become 'too sensitive' because it lacks normal protection from clothing, a service provided by the foreskin. Circumsision fucks up everything.
