Thursday, May 07, 2009
Legalization and Transplantation
(4)
Booze and sleep-dep have obviously taken their toll, folks, as I have at least two subjects left to address at 1830L: Marijuana Legalization and Foreskin Transplantation. And I just popped open beer #10. Yeesh! But plodding right along concerning the first subject of Marijuana Legalization, I recently noticed that the governor of California has called for serious discussion concerning the legalization of Marijuana. Good Job! The economic idea seems to be to reduce local law-enforcement expenditure by doing away with the outmoded drug laws. This would result in savings all across the California state budget. Good idea: the results would be increased revenue in the form of taxes, and less revenue expenditure in the form of the odious PP (Prisons and Police) which every state now endures. The idea seems to be an economic winner because state and local police, released from the obligation to enforce silly laws, could concentrate on more important transgressions nearer to the hearts of 'otherwise invisible victims.' Increased revenues could also be directed toward 'rehab' instead of 'prehab.' I'm all for that! Let's decriminalize Marijuana, tax it, and provide funds for rehabilitation if (and as) necessary.
And concerning the subject of foreskin transplation, I have a similar idea: Outlaw infant sexual mutilation (circumcision), but cut off criminality in that regard at the age of 18: any male, 18 or over, would have the right to have his penis 'modified' in the Judeo-Muslim manner.
Let me be very clear about this: sexual mutilation of children below the age of 18 should be a crime punishable by a jail term of at least one year without parole, per count. Jews and Muslims should not be allowed to evade this law. Circumcision should be treated as a 'human rights' issue - not a religious issue - and violation should be treated as a crime against children.
Finally, the government should provide funds to circumcised males who qualify for 'foreskin transplants.' Such males would need only show that the American Jewish Establishment influenced their personal sexual mutilation. Such a finding by any court would be sufficient cause for a $20,000 transplantation award.
Booze and sleep-dep have obviously taken their toll, folks, as I have at least two subjects left to address at 1830L: Marijuana Legalization and Foreskin Transplantation. And I just popped open beer #10. Yeesh! But plodding right along concerning the first subject of Marijuana Legalization, I recently noticed that the governor of California has called for serious discussion concerning the legalization of Marijuana. Good Job! The economic idea seems to be to reduce local law-enforcement expenditure by doing away with the outmoded drug laws. This would result in savings all across the California state budget. Good idea: the results would be increased revenue in the form of taxes, and less revenue expenditure in the form of the odious PP (Prisons and Police) which every state now endures. The idea seems to be an economic winner because state and local police, released from the obligation to enforce silly laws, could concentrate on more important transgressions nearer to the hearts of 'otherwise invisible victims.' Increased revenues could also be directed toward 'rehab' instead of 'prehab.' I'm all for that! Let's decriminalize Marijuana, tax it, and provide funds for rehabilitation if (and as) necessary.
And concerning the subject of foreskin transplation, I have a similar idea: Outlaw infant sexual mutilation (circumcision), but cut off criminality in that regard at the age of 18: any male, 18 or over, would have the right to have his penis 'modified' in the Judeo-Muslim manner.
Let me be very clear about this: sexual mutilation of children below the age of 18 should be a crime punishable by a jail term of at least one year without parole, per count. Jews and Muslims should not be allowed to evade this law. Circumcision should be treated as a 'human rights' issue - not a religious issue - and violation should be treated as a crime against children.
Finally, the government should provide funds to circumcised males who qualify for 'foreskin transplants.' Such males would need only show that the American Jewish Establishment influenced their personal sexual mutilation. Such a finding by any court would be sufficient cause for a $20,000 transplantation award.
