Friday, June 16, 2006

 

The Malicious Legacy of Abraham

(3)

TPEP would certainly be the driving force behind the circumcision of South Korea, also a 20th Century phenomenon. But how did it begin? What was the 'rationale?' And, importantly, does the 38th parallel form a demarkation line between the Cuts and Uncuts of Korea? Is it more than than just politics? Is it also a penis problem?

At this point I should probably mention other psychological processes which are the antithesis of TPEP: Hmm... I'm thinking... Ok, I'll call them the (saved by the bell at 1728) circumcision revulsion reactions: CRR. CRR is a normal reaction to circumcision: the Uncut is revulsed at seeing the mutilation. Furthermore the Uncut understands some of the implications of the mutilation: decreased sensitivity and decreased ability to masturbate. The Uncut understands that the Cut suffers from an unnatural orgasm-deprivation condition. Eventually the Uncut understands that this unfortunate situation leads to the malice of Penis Envy, a malice which extends even to the children of the Cut.

This familial malice is the real legacy of Abraham.
Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?